Grievance
Theater At Minneapolis International Airport
Debra Burlingame
December 6, 2006
Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Those are the
words that started it all. Six bearded imams are said to have shouted
them out while offering evening prayers as they and 141 other
passengers waited at the gate for their flight out of Minneapolis
International Airport. It was three days before Thanksgiving. Allahu
Akbar: God is great.
Initial media reports of the incident did not include the disturbing
details about what happened after they boarded US Airways flight 300,
but the story quickly went national with provocative headlines: "Six
Muslims Ejected from US Air Flight for Praying." Yes, they were
praying--but let's be clear about this. The very last human sound on
the cockpit voice recorder of United flight 93 before it screamed into
the ground at 580 miles per hour is the sound of male voices shouting
"Allahu Akbar" in a moment of religious ecstasy.
They, too, were praying. The passengers and crew of flight 93 lost
their valiant fight to take back the plane just one hour and 20 minutes
after it pushed back from the gate. Until the hijackers stormed the
cockpit door, they were just a handful of Middle Eastern-looking men on
their way to sunny California. So, yes, let's be exceedingly clear
about the whole matter. Some 3,000 men, women and children are dead
because the unassuming people on those airplanes did not look at them
and see murderers. Or dangerous Arabs. Or fanatical Muslims. They saw a
few guys in chinos.
In five years since the 9/11 attacks, U.S. commercial carriers have
transported approximately 2.9 billion domestic and international
passengers. It is a testament to the flying public, but, most of all,
to the flight crews who put those planes into the air and who daily
devote themselves to the safety and well-being of their passengers,
that they have refused to succumb to ethnic hatred, religious
intolerance or irrational fear on those millions of flights. But they
have not forgotten the sight of a 200,000-pound aircraft slicing
through heavy steel and concrete as easily as a knife through butter.
They still remember the voices of men and women in the prime of their
lives saying final goodbyes, people who just moments earlier set down
their coffee and looked out the window to a beautiful new morning.
Today, when travelers and flight crews arrive at the airport, all the
overheated rhetoric of the civil rights absolutists, all the empty
claims of government career bureaucrats, all the disingenuous promises
of the election-focused politicians just fall away. They have families.
They have responsibilities. To them, this is not a game or a cause.
This is real life.
Given that Islamic terrorists continue their obsession with turning
airplanes into weapons of mass destruction, it is nothing short of
obscene that these six religious leaders--fresh from attending a
conference of the North American Imams Federation, featuring
discussions on "Imams and Politics" and "Imams and the Media"--chose to
turn that airport into a stage and that airplane into a prop in the
service of their need for grievance theater. The reality is, these
passengers endured a frightening 3 1/2-hour ordeal, which included a
front-to-back sweep of the aircraft with a bomb-sniffing dog, in order
to advance the provocative agenda of these imams in, of all the
inappropriate places after 9/11, U.S. airports.
"Allahu Akbar" was just the opening act. After boarding, they did not
take their assigned seats but dispersed to seats in the first row of
first class, in the midcabin exit rows and in the rear--the exact
configuration of the 9/11 execution teams. The head of the group,
seated closest to the cockpit, and two others asked for a seatbelt
extension, kept on board for obese people. A heavy metal buckle at the
end of a long strap, it can easily be used as a lethal weapon. The
three men rolled them up and placed them on the floor under their
seats. And lest this entire incident be written off as simple cultural
ignorance, a frightened Arabic-speaking passenger pulled aside a crew
member and translated the imams' suspicious conversations, which
included angry denunciations of Americans, furious grumblings about
U.S. foreign policy, Osama Bin Laden and "killing Saddam."
Predictably, these imams and their attorneys now suggest that another
passenger who penned a frantic note of warning and slipped it to a
flight attendant was somehow a hysterical Islamophobe. Let us remember
that but for their performance at the gate this passenger might never
have noticed these men or their behavior on board, much less have the
slightest clue as to their religion or political passions. Of course,
that was the point of the shouting. According to the police report, yet
another alarmed passenger who frequently travels to the Middle East
described a conversation with one of the imams. The 31-year-old
Egyptian expressed fundamentalist Muslim views, and stated the he would
go to whatever measures necessary to obey all the tenets set out in the
Koran.
The activist Muslim American Society (MAS) issued a press release
within hours of the incident, demanding an apology and announcing a
"pray-in" at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C. Standing just
a short distance from the Pentagon, where five years ago black plumes
of smoke from the crash of American Airlines flight 77 could be seen
for miles, the assembled demonstrators complained that African-American
Muslims, accustomed to "driving while black," must now cope with the
injustice of "flying while Muslim." This brazen two-step is racial
politics at its worst; none of the imams are African-American. MAS,
which teaches an "Activist Training" program with lessons on "how to
talk to the media," must have been thrilled when one cable news outfit,
suckered by the rhetoric, compared the imams' conduct to that of civil
rights icon Rosa Parks, who refused to give up her bus seat in the face
of institutional racism. One wonders what the parents of the three
11-year-olds who died on flight 77--all African-American kids on a
National Geographic field trip--would make of this stunning comparison.
Today, MAS Executive Director Mahdi Bray says his organization wants
more than an apology. He wants to "hit [US Airways] where it hurts, the
pocketbook," and, joined by the Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR), will seek compensation for the imams, civil and federal
monetary sanctions, and new, sweeping legislation that will extract
even bigger penalties for airlines that engage in "racial and religious
profiling." An investigation by the Department of Homeland Security's
Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties is under way. Not
incidentally, it is the "fatwa department" of MAS that pushed for
segregated taxi lines that would permit Muslim cab drivers at the
Minneapolis airport to reject passengers carrying alcohol.
Here's what the flying public needs to know about airplanes and civil
rights: Once your foot traverses the entranceway of a commercial
airliner, you are no longer in a democracy in which everyone gets a
vote and minority rights are affirmatively protected in furtherance of
fuzzy, ever-shifting social policy. Ultimately, the responsibility for
your personal safety and security rests on the shoulders of one person,
the pilot in command. His primary job is to safely transport you and
your belongings from one place to another. Period.
This is the doctrine of "captain's authority." It has a longstanding
history and a statutory mandate, further strengthened after 9/11, which
recognizes that flight crews are our last line of defense between the
kernel of a terrorist plot and its lethal execution. The day we tell
the captain of a commercial airliner that he cannot remove a problem
passenger unless he divines beyond question what is in that passenger's
head and heart is the day our commercial aviation system begins to
crumble. When a passenger's conduct is so disturbing and disruptive
that reasonable, ordinary people fear for their lives, the captain must
have the discretionary authority to respond without having to consider
equal protection or First Amendment standards about which even trained
lawyers with the clarity of hindsight might strongly disagree. The
pilot in command can't get it wrong. At 35,000 feet, when multiple
events are rapidly unfolding in real time, there is no room for error.
We have a new, inviolate aviation standard after 9/11, which requires
that the captain cannot take that airplane up so long as there are any
unresolved issues with respect to the security of his airplane. At
altitude, the cockpit door is barred and crews are instructed not to
open them no matter what is happening in the cabin behind them. This is
an extremely challenging situation for the men and women who fly those
planes, one that those who write federal aviation regulations and the
people who agitate for more restrictions on a captain's authority will
never have to face themselves.
Likewise, flight attendants are confined in the back of the plane with
upwards of 200 people; they must be the eyes and ears, not just for the
pilot but for us all. They are not combat specialists, however, and to
compel them to ignore all but the most unambiguous cases of suspicious
behavior is to further enable terrorists who act in ways meant to defy
easy categorization. As the American Airlines flight attendants who
literally jumped on "shoe bomber" Richard Reid demonstrated, cabin
crews are sharply attuned to unusual or abnormal behavior and they must
not be second-guessed, or hamstrung by misguided notions of political
correctness.
Ultimately, the most despicable aspect about the imams' behavior is
that when they pierced the normally quiet hum of a passenger waiting
area with shouts of "Allahu Akbar"and deliberately engaged in
terrorist-associated behavior that was sure to trigger suspicion, they
exploited the fear that began with the Sept. 11 attacks. The imams,
experienced travelers all, counted on the security system established
after 9/11 to kick in, and now they plan not only to benefit
financially from the proper operation of that system but to
substantially weaken it--with help from the Saudi-endowed attorneys at
CAIR.
US Airways is right to stand by its flight crew. It will be both
dangerous and disgraceful if the Department of Homeland Security, the
Department of Transportation and, ultimately, our federal courts allow
aviation security measures put in place after 9/11 to be cynically
manipulated in the name of civil rights.
Ms. Burlingame, a director of
the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation, is the sister of Charles F.
"Chic" Burlingame III, the pilot of American Airlines flight 77, which
was crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.
Copyright © 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.