Patrick J. Buchanan
September 29, 2006
In July, our trade deficit hit yet another all-time record, $68
billion, an annual rate of $816 billion. Imports surged to $188 billion
for the month, as our dependency on foreigners for the vital
necessities of our national life ever deepens.
China's trade surplus with us was $19.6 billion for July alone, moving
toward an all-time record of $235 billion for 2006 -- the largest trade
deficit one country has ever run with another. Our deficit with Mexico
is running at an annual rate of $60 billion. With Canada, it is $70
billion. So much for NAFTA. With the European Union, it is running at
$160 billion.
America as the most self-sufficient republic in history is history. For
decades, U.S. factories have been closing. Three million manufacturing
jobs have disappeared since Bush arrived. Ford and GM are fighting for
their lives.
Bushites boast of all the new jobs created, but Business Week tells the
inconvenient truth: "Since 2001, 1.7 million new jobs have been created
in the health care sector. ... Meanwhile, the number of private sector
jobs outside of health care is no higher than it was five years ago."
"Perhaps most surprising," writes BW, "information technology, the
great electronic promise of the 1990s, has turned into one of the
biggest job-growth disappointments of all time. ... (B)usinesses at the
core of the information economy -- software, semiconductors, telecom
and the whole gamut of Web companies -- have lost more than 1.1 million
jobs in the past five years. Those business employ fewer Americans than
they did in 1998, when the Internet economy kicked into high gear."
Where did the high-tech go? China. Beijing's No. 1 export to the United
States in 2005, $50 billion worth, was computers and electronics.
If Americans are the most efficient workers on earth and work longer
hours than almost any other advanced nation, why are we getting our
clocks cleaned? Answer: While American workers are world-class, our
elites are mentally challenged. So rhapsodic are they about the Global
Economy they have forgotten their own country. Europeans, Japanese,
Canadians and Chinese sell us so much more than they buy from us,
because they have rigged the rules of world trade.
While the United States has a corporate income tax, our trade rivals
use a value-added tax. At each level of production, a tax is imposed on
the value added to the product. Under the rules of global trade,
nations may rebate VAT levies on exports, and impose the equivalent of
a VAT on imports.
Assume a VAT that adds up to 15 percent of the cost of a new car in
Japan. If Toyota ships 1 million cars to the United States valued at
$20,000 each, $20 billion worth of Toyotas, they can claim a rebate of
the VAT of $3,000 on each car, or $3 billion -- a powerful incentive to
export. But each U.S. car arriving at the Yokohama docks will have 15
percent added to its sticker price to make up for Japan's VAT.
This amounts to a foreign subsidy on exports to the United States and a
foreign tax on imports from America. Uncle Sam gets hit coming and
going. It is as though, after firing a round of 66 in the Masters,
Tiger Woods has five strokes added to his score for a 71, and five
strokes are subtracted from the scores of his rivals. Even Tiger would
bring home few trophies with those kind of ground rules.
The total tax disadvantage to U.S. producers -- of VAT rebates and VAT
equivalents imposed on U.S. products -- is estimated at $294 billion.
Exported U.S services face the same double whammy. A VAT equivalent is
imposed on them, while the exported services of foreign providers get
the VAT rebate. Disadvantage to U.S. services: $85 billion annually.
Why do our politicians not level the playing field for U.S. companies?
First, ignorance of how world trade works. Second, ideology. These
robotic free-traders recoil from any suggestion that they aid U.S.
producers against unfair foreign tactics as interfering with Adam
Smith's "invisible hand," which they equate with the hand of the
Almighty.
Third, they are hauling water for transnational companies that want to
move production overseas and shed their U.S. workers.
How could we level the playing field? Simple. Impose an "equalizing
fee" on imports equal to the rebates. Take the billions raised, and cut
taxes on U.S. companies, especially in production. Create a level
playing field for U.S. goods and services in foreign markets, and
increase the competitiveness of U.S. companies in our own home market
by reducing their tax load.
U.S. trade deficits would shrivel overnight. And jobs and factories
lately sent abroad would start coming home.
Isn't it time we put America first -- even ahead of China?