|
|

Click on the image to visit Opinion Journal
|
|
|
SUPPORT
|
WRITE
YOUR
|
|
TERM
|
CONGRESSMAN
|
|
LIMITS
|
IT
WORKS !!!
|
|
|
|
Pirates, Terrorism and Failed States

The article on this page is owned
and copyrighted by the named author
Link
to original article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122869822798786931.html?mod=djemEditorialPage
Max Boot
Wall Street Journal
December 8, 2008
It's time to get serious about bringing order to places like Somalia and Pakistan's tribal areas.
Ever since the end of the Cold War, there has been much chatter about
the problem of failed states. Now we are seeing some of the terrible
consequences of state failure on the periphery of the broader Middle
East.
In Pakistan, terrorist groups such as the Taliban, al Qaeda, and
Lashkar-e-Taiba have established themselves as a state within a state.
They have virtual free reign in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas
and a lesser but still substantial amount of leeway in the Northwest
Frontier and other provinces. That makes it all too easy for them to
launch attacks such as those that killed more than 170 people in
Mumbai. Or other attacks that kill NATO soldiers in Afghanistan.
Across the Indian Ocean, pirates are terrorizing passing ships. The
International Maritime Bureau reports that 92 ships have been attacked
and 36 hijacked this year off the coast of Somalia and Yemen. At least
14 ships and 260 crew members are being held hostage. A passenger liner
with more than 1,000 people aboard barely avoided being the pirates'
latest prize. Vessels that were not so lucky include a Saudi oil tanker
carrying two million barrels of crude oil and a Ukrainian freighter
loaded with tanks and other weapons.
The predations of pirates and terrorists -- two species of
international outlaws -- have caused much handwringing and a so-far
unsuccessful search for solutions. The United Nations has authorized
warships to enter Somalia's territorial waters and use "all necessary
force" against the pirates. A number of states, including the U.S.,
have sent their own naval vessels to help, but their numbers are
grossly inadequate to safeguard thousands of miles of water. The
increasingly bold desperados are venturing farther and farther from
shore in search of ever more lucrative prizes.
The response in Pakistan has been just as limited and just as
ineffective. India, the U.S., Afghanistan and other concerned states
have spent years begging Islamabad to crack down on terrorists. These
pleas have been backed up by offers of aid and threats if inaction
continues. Neither has done much good. The Pakistani army appears
either unwilling or unable -- maybe both -- to take effective action
against powerful jihadist groups that have longstanding links with its
own Inter-Services Intelligence agency. In desperation, the U.S. has
resorted to picking off individual terrorists with unmanned aerial
vehicles. This tactic works and should be continued, but it is no more
than a band-aid on a gaping wound.
The essential problem in both Somalia and Pakistan is a failure of
governance. The question is: What if anything can outside powers do to
bring the rule of law to these troubled lands? In the 19th century, the
answer was simple: European imperialists would plant their flag and
impose their laws at gunpoint. The territory that now comprises
Pakistan was not entirely peaceful when it was under British rule. Nor
was Somalia under Italian and British sovereignty. But they were
considerably better off than they are today -- not only from the
standpoint of Western countries but also from the standpoint of their
own citizens.
You might think that such imperialism is simply unacceptable today. But
you would be only partially right. There have been a number of
instances in recent years of imperialism-in-all-but-name. Bosnia and
Kosovo -- still wards of NATO and the European Union -- are prominent
examples of how successful such interventions can be in the right
circumstances.
The real difficulty with emulating these examples is not a lack of
legitimacy. That can always be conferred by the United Nations or some
other multilateral organization. Harder to overcome is a lack of will.
Ragtag guerrillas have proven dismayingly successful in driving out or
neutering international peacekeeping forces. Think of American and
French troops blown up in Beirut in 1983, or the "Black Hawk Down"
incident in Somalia in 1993.
Too often, when outside states do agree to send troops, they are so
fearful of casualties that they impose rules of engagement that
preclude meaningful action. Think of the ineffectiveness of African
Union peacekeepers dealing with genocide in Darfur today or of U.N.
peacekeepers dealing with genocide in Rwanda in 1994. Even the world's
mightiest military alliance is not immune from these problems. Witness
the problems NATO has encountered in trying to get member states to
live up to their commitments in Afghanistan.
If NATO won't do enough to win the war in Afghanistan, its highest
priority, there is scant chance that it will commit troops to police
Pakistan's tribal areas or Somalia's coast. And if NATO members won't
act, who will? That difficulty renders moot ideas such as the one just
put forward by foreign-policy theorist Robert Kagan: "Have the
international community declare that parts of Pakistan have become
ungovernable and a menace to international security. Establish an
international force to work with the Pakistanis to root out terrorist
camps in Kashmir as well as in the tribal areas."
It is a tragedy that such proposals have no chance of being acted upon
until some truly great tragedy occurs. If we suffer another 9/11 or
worse and the culprits can be traced to Pakistan, then the U.S. and its
allies would summon the wherewithal to act. But not until then.
Given that dismal reality, it makes sense to think of second-best
alternatives. In the case of the Somali pirates, creative solutions can
include using air and naval power to hit the bases from which they
operate, and employing Blackwater and other mercenaries to add their
protective efforts to those of the world's navies. In Pakistan that
means continuing air strikes and providing assistance to tribal
militias which have their own grievances against jihadist interlopers.
In both places, the U.S. should be doing what it can, in cooperation
with allies and multilateral organizations, to bolster central
authority.
But we should not fool ourselves into thinking that any of these
measures has much chance of success. Until we are willing to place more
ungoverned spaces under international administration, evils such as
piracy and terrorism will continue to flourish.
Mr. Boot is a senior fellow at
the Council on Foreign Relations and author, most recently, of "War
Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to
Today"(Gotham, 2006).