Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y - "I don't know what Caroline Kennedy's
qualifications are. Except that she has name recognition, but so does
J-Lo."
WASHINGTON -- Right idea, wrong argument. The problem with Caroline
Kennedy's presumption to Hillary Clinton's soon-to-be-vacated Senate
seat is not lack of qualification or experience. The Senate houses lots
of inexperienced rookies -- wealthy businessmen, sports stars, even the
occasional actor.
The problem is Kennedy's sense of entitlement. Given her rather modest achievements, she is trading entirely on pedigree.
I hate to be a good government scold, but wasn't the American experiment a rather firm renunciation of government by pedigree?
Yes, the Founders were not democrats. They believed in aristocracy. But
their idea was government by natural -- not inherited -- aristocracy,
an aristocracy of "virtue and talents," as Jefferson put it.
And yes, of course, we have our own history of dynastic succession:
Adamses and Harrisons, and in the last century, Roosevelts, Kennedys
and Bushes. Recently, we've even branched out into Argentine-style
marital transmission, as in the Doles and the Clintons.
It's not the end of the world, but it is an accelerating trend that
need not be encouraged. After all, we have already created another huge
distortion in our politics: a plethora of plutocrats in the U.S.
Senate, courtesy of our crazed campaign finance laws. If you're very
very rich, you can buy your Senate seat by spending as much of your
money as you want. Meanwhile, your poor plebeian opponent is running
around groveling for the small contributions allowed by law. Hence the
Corzines and the Kohls, who parachute into Congress seemingly out of
nowhere.
Having given this additional leg up to the rich, we should resist
packing our legislatures with yet more privileged parachutists, the
well-born.
True, the Brits did it that way for centuries, but with characteristic
honesty. They established a house of Parliament exclusively for
highborn twits and ensconced them there for life. There they chatter
away in supreme irrelevance deep into their dotage. Problem is that the
U.S. Senate retains House of Commons powers even as it develops a House
of Lords membership.
Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against Caroline Kennedy. She seems
a fine person. She certainly has led the life of a worthy socialite
helping all the right causes. But when the mayor of New York endorses
her candidacy by offering, among other reasons, that "her uncle has
been one of the best senators that we have had in an awful long time,"
we've reached the point of embarrassment.
Nor is Ms. Kennedy alone in her sense of entitlement. Vice
President-elect Biden's Senate seat will now be filled by Edward
Kaufman, a family retainer whom no one ever heard of before yesterday.
And no one will hear from after two years, at which time Kaufman will
dutifully retire. He understands his responsibility: Keep the Delaware
Senate seat warm for two years until Joe's son returns from Iraq to
assume his father's mantle.
This, of course, is the Kennedy way. In 1960, John Kennedy's Senate
seat was given to his Harvard roommate, one Ben Smith II (priceless
name). He stayed on for two years -- until Teddy reached the
constitutional age of 30 required to succeed his brother.
In light of the pending dynastic disposition of the New York and
Delaware Senate seats, the Illinois way is almost refreshing. At least
Gov. Rod Blagojevich (allegedly) made Barack Obama's seat
democratically open to all. Just register the highest bid, eBay style.
Sadly, however, even this auction was not free of aristo-creep. On the
evidence of the U.S. attorney's criminal complaint, a full one-third of
those under consideration were pedigreed: Candidate No. 2 turns out to
be the daughter of the speaker of the Illinois House; Candidate No. 5,
the first-born son of the Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Caroline Kennedy, Beau Biden and Jesse Jackson Jr. could some day
become great senators. But in a country where advantages of education,
upbringing and wealth already make the playing field extraordinarily
uneven, we should resist encouraging the one form of advantage the
American Republic strove to abolish: title.
No lords or ladies here. If Princess Caroline wants a seat in the
Senate, let her do it by election. There's one in 2010. To do it now by
appointment on the basis of bloodline is an offense to the most minimal
republicanism. Every state in the union is entitled to representation
in the Senate. Camelot is not a state.
