|
|
 |
|
| |
|
| SUPPORT |
WRITE YOUR |
| TERM |
CONGRESSMAN |
| LIMITS |
IT WORKS
!!! |
| |
|
| |
|
Losing The Energy
Race

The article on this page
is owned and copyrighted by the named author
Link to original
article: http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080521/COMMENTARY/967924514/1012
H. Sterling Burnett
May 21, 2008
Shock and awe we are living it! We stand, mouth agape, staring at the pump
at $4 gallons and fast-emptying pocketbooks. Even worse, with crude oil already
costing more than $120 a barrel, many predict this wave has yet to crest.
And while we wait for the price to peak, spending shrinks and the
economic outlook worsens. Our energy policies have failed us, and now, we pay
the price literally.
In response, politicians call for windfall
profits taxes and temporary gas tax holidays. Once again, we're forced to
stomach politically motivated, short-term non-answers instead of long-term
solutions. Here's a thought: Rather than vilify the oil industry for our sticker
shock, let's take a hard look at the actions of our federal government.
For years, we've approached domestic drilling in a politically correct
manner, placing caribou on a pedestal while ignoring American consumers and
national security. Politicians chose to outsource and import, instead of expand
and drill. As a result, we fill the coffers of foreign nations instead of
boosting American gross domestic product.
In a recent press conference,
President Bush suggested drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
He might be on to something. Despite the hysterical claims of environmental
lobbyists, oil and the environment can mix. Caribou and other wildlife have
expanded and flourished in and around Prudhoe Bay, apparently unaffected by the
relatively primitive oil and gas development in the area.
And technology
in the oil industry has improved mightily in the years since the Arctic Slope
was first tapped. Indeed, two leading environmental groups, the Audubon Society
and the Nature Conservancy, have allowed oil and gas production on several of
their most important and unique nature preserves.
Unfortunately, the
United States Congress has also banned energy exploration in 85 percent of our
coastal waters. As a result, while Cuba, in partnership with China, drills
closer to the U.S. coastline than we do, the United States goes hat-in-hand to
Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Canada, Nigeria, Mexico and even Iran. Our lawmakers'
decision to block domestic access harms both the public and the environment.
Since 1991, oil tankers have spilled 3 times more oil than offshore
platforms. Furthermore, when tankers leak, they tend to do so near shore,
resulting in more severe environmental damage. Thus, because platforms are less
prone to spills than are tankers, producing more oil off America's coast could
be environmentally beneficial.
It is estimated that beneath America's
coast lies enough oil to fuel 60 million cars in the United States for 60 years
and enough natural gas to heat 60 million homes for 160 years.
Our
nation and the world will need significant amounts of oil and natural gas
well into the future. The U.S. Energy Information Administration says the United
States alone will need 19 percent more energy in 2030. Globally, that number
jumps to 55 percent.
While renewables and alternatives are a part of
tomorrow's energy mix, they cannot represent the entire answer. In the year
2030, those "fuels of the future" will only comprise 9 percent of consumer
demand. More than 60 percent of demand will continue to be fulfilled by oil and
natural gas. We must take those numbers to heart and remove barriers to domestic
drilling.
In China, more than a billion people are beginning to taste
unparalleled economic success. Each year, increasing numbers of Chinese citizens
demand cars, air conditioning, televisions, refrigerators, personal computers
and other electronics. Each of these benefits of progress will require more, not
less, energy.
And the same story echoes around the globe as economies
liberalize and material progress becomes more widespread and the race for
energy gets fiercer.
While political pundits speculate that America will
stay ahead of the curve, thousands of unemployed American workers tell a
different story we are already falling behind the eight ball and political
roadblocks to domestic energy development are partly to blame.
Here's a
shocking fact: The world's largest private oil producer, Exxon, ranks just 16th
in the world. Government-controlled oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq,
Venezuela, Russia, Mexico and Libya contain more fuel than America's largest oil
producer owns. Yet, if allowed access to U.S. oil reserves in Alaska and off the
coast, American oil companies could increase our reserves about fivefold
taking the United States from 11th place to fourth among countries with proven
reserves.
The United States is losing the energy race not because we are
being beaten but because we don't allow domestic companies to compete. For our
nation's security, for our consumers' well-being, and for our workers' continued
economic progress, it's time for Congress to let American companies get in the
game. Let the drilling begin.
H. Sterling Burnett is a
senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis, a nonpartisan,
nonprofit research institute in Dallas.
|
|
|
|
 |